2006年研究生英语一翻译

Our department has already made the marketing plan of the third quarter of 2006. We will hold a meeting at the meeting room to discuss this plan. The time is 1:00 pm, 19th June, 2006. The manager of each department should attend the meeting. Please inform our secretary in advance if you can not attend. 基本是直译的回哦答.

06年以前的六级题目是老老题型，非常难，基本可以不用做了如果你想提高实力，直接做新托福阅读

我09年考研 英语79分 告诉你 完型根本不用这么复习 在阅读理解上下工夫就好了 所以你不必要完型的翻译，就算需要 别人翻译你拿现成的也不如你自己翻译的提高的多

这个应该要结合上下句来翻译，所以我姑且给出这些的意思、Almost：几乎，差不多After all：毕竟版，终究Completely：完全地One modern:亲，权你应该是断句断错了，这里是”one form of babablabla“， “modern”是修饰，所以总的来说“one modern form of something“：一种现代的方式，形式全句单独直接翻译出来是：毕竟，哪一种是现代社会近乎完全的表达快乐的形式呢？如果有上下句，应该翻译的好一点。这个应该要结合上下句来翻译，所以我姑且给出这些的意思、Almost：几乎，专差不多After all：毕竟，终究属Completely：完全地One modern:亲，你应该是断句断错了，这里是”one form of babablabla“， “modern”是修饰，所以总的来说“one modern form of something“：一种现代的方式，形式全句单独直接翻译出来是：毕竟，哪一种是现代社会近乎完全的表达快乐的形式呢？

意思说美国这个国家太大了，任何事都有发生的可能。它无所不能好酷炫的翻译

在每个15个最常见的原籍国里

主句：More artists [主语]began [谓语] seeing happiness as meaningless, phony or, worst of all, boring. [宾语]从句：We [主语] went [谓语] from Wordsworth's daffodils [状语] to Baudelaire's flowers of evil. [状语]meaningless/phony/boring是三个并列的形容词，worst of all是一个插入回语，因为phony后面答有一个or。翻译：越来越多的艺术家开始把幸福看成是无意义的、虚伪的，最糟糕的是无聊至极的，这种变化从华兹华斯的《水仙》到波德莱尔的《恶之花》中都可以看出。

我错了12个，我也觉得06年的格外难

08年考3337616439研英语阅读理解第三篇翻译： 在20世纪60年代早期，Wilt Chamberlain是美国国家篮球协会中仅有的身高超过7英尺的三个人之一。可是如果他参加了上个赛季的话，他就变成了42分之一了。这些年来在较大的职业体育运动中的运动员的身体状况发生了很大的改变，而他们的经理人也更愿意调整队员的运动服来适应队员们更大，更高的身材。 虽然体育界的这种趋势可能蒙蔽了一个没有被承认的现实：美国人基本上停止生长了。虽然现在人们比140年前高了2英寸，特别是那些出生在已移民美国很多代的那些人，但是明显的，在二十世纪60年代早期，已经到达了他们的身高的极限。他们已经不可能再长得更高了。“在这个基因和环境的条件下，现在整体的人们已经长到我们能够达到的范围了，”Wright州大学的人类学家William Cameron Chumlea说道。拿NBA球员来说，他们身高的增加主要由于从世界各地招募到了球员。 身高的增长一般在20岁以后就停止了，而发育是需要能量和营养的，其中的蛋白质用来供给组织的生长。在20世纪初，营养不良和儿童疾病妨碍了整体的发育。但是当饮食和健康的促进，儿童和青少年平均每20年都增长了大概1.5英寸，这就是长高的趋势。根据疾病防治中心，从1960年开始，人们的平均身高，男性5英尺9英寸，女性5英尺4英寸，就没有怎么改变了。 总的说来，避免太高的身高是有很多优点的。在生产时，较大的婴儿通过产道是有更多的问题的。而且，就算人类已经直立行走已经几百万年了，我们的脚和背部继续对抗着巨大的压力，这些压力来源于双足直立的姿势和巨大的肢体。“有一些限制是个体器官的基因结构导致的。”西北大学的人类学家William Leonard说道。基因的最大化可以改变，但是不要期待它会马上就能发生。Mass州的Natick的军队研究中心的高级人类学家Claire C. Gordon确信百分之九十的入伍新兵不需要更换新的制服和工作站。她说，不像那些篮球制服，军队的制服长度很长时间都没有改变了。如果你需要在不远的将来预测人类的身高而去设计一款新的设备，Gordon说基本上，“你都能够使用现在的数据并且觉得非常地自信。”Text 3　　In the early 1960s Wilt Chamberlain was one of only three players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) listed at over seven feet. If he had played last season, however, he would have been one of 42. The bodies playing major professional sports have changed dramatically over the years, and managers have been more than willing to adjust team uniforms to fit the growing numbers of bigger, longer frames.　　The trend in sports, though, may be obscuring an unrecognized reality: Americans have generally stopped growing. Though typically about two inches taller now than 140 years ago, today’s people – especially those born to families who have lived in the U.S. for many generations – apparently reached their limit in the early 1960s. And they aren’t likely to get any taller. “In the general population today, at this genetic, environmental level, we’ve pretty much gone as far as we can go,” says anthropologist William Cameron Chumlea of Wright State University. In the case of NBA players, their increase in height appears to result from the increasingly common practice of recruiting players from all over the world.　　Growth, which rarely continues beyond the age of 20, demands calories and nutrients – notably, protein – to feed expanding tissues. At the start of the 20th century, under-nutrition and childhood infections got in the way. But as diet and health improved, children and adolescents have, on average, increased in height by about an inch and a half every 20 years, a pattern known as the secular trend in height. Yet according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, average height – 5′9″ for men, 5′4″ for women – hasn’t really changed since 1960.　　Genetically speaking, there are advantages to avoiding substantial height. During childbirth, larger babies have more difficulty passing through the birth canal. Moreover, even though humans have been upright for millions of years, our feet and back continue to struggle with bipedal posture and cannot easily withstand repeated strain imposed by oversize limbs. “There are some real constraints that are set by the genetic architecture of the indivial organism,” says anthropologist William Leonard of Northwestern University.　　Genetic maximums can change, but don’t expect this to happen soon. Claire C. Gordon, senior anthropologist at the Army Research Center in Natick, Mass., ensures that 90 percent of the uniforms and workstations fit recruits without alteration. She says that, unlike those for basketball, the length of military uniforms has not changed for some time. And if you need to predict human height in the near future to design a piece of equipment, Gordon says that by and large, “you could use today’s data and feel fairly confident.”