1996年考研英语阅读text3

required by 如果没有by你的翻译就是正确的了by 表示被（要求）所以是后者需要前者

去百度文库，查看完整内容>内容来自用户:SWOT6662000年-2018年考研英语一考研阅读难易总目录注:难易设定标准按照文章内容和题目难度综合考虑。2000.Text1顺境表面不好，但还是好中上Text2人类已经停止进化易Text3未来派诗歌不好易Text4日本道德社会风气不好中上Text5鼓励公开树立远大理想难2001.Text1专业细分和专业化难Text2数字鸿沟中Text3美国的媒体不好易Text4合并浪潮易Text5辞职低调的生活难2002.Text1幽默的效果中Text2机器人不如人类聪明中上Text3石油危机为什么不会引起恐慌易Text4安乐死非法和医疗死亡原则的漏洞和建议难2003.Text1网络间谍中上Text2动物有没有动物权利易Text3铁路系统兼并不会垄断难Text4死亡的现实性中上2004.Text1网络找工作中Text2人名歧视易Text3美国经济不景气，但还行中上Text4美国教育不应重视实用主义难2005.Text1猴子和人一样会因不公而愤怒中Text2环境保护与抽烟一样，要引以为戒中上Text3睡觉中做梦是可以被控制的难Text4语言向非正式语言发展难2006.Text1美国大熔炉同化能力中Text2英国旅游小镇中上Text3海洋生物保护难Text4忧愁艺术难2007.Text1足球明星出生于上半年纯属偶然中Text2IQ测试是否科学中Text3美国中产阶级生活已经危险难Text4信息安全立法的必要性难2008.Text 3.

我认为which的先行词是ratewhich指的是most estimates of the matural rate of unemployment，我英语语法不太好，学英语凭的是语感和理解，毕竟是一种语言，我也考试。有时间可以交流一下英语学习the rate below which是个定语从句做 inflation的定语 这里 the rate是主语 below 是介词 which 指的是most estimates of the matural rate of unemployment

选c啊 d是直接意思

1、经济类文章主要来源：The Economist ，Business Week，Wall Street Journal;2、科学技术类文章主要来源：Nature (自然)，Discovery (探索)，Science (科学)，National Geographic ，Scientific American ，New Scientists ;3、社会生活以及文化类文章主要来源：Newsweek，Time ，U.S News and World Report ，The Washington Post ，USA Today ，The Times (泰晤士报)，The Guardian (卫报)，和The World Report ，New York Post(纽约邮报)4、其它来源：Independent ， International Herald Tribune ， Telegraph 。完全没必要，看历年真题足够了！

对于这种实际情况我们实在值得庆幸，因为要在穷国建立全新的教育体系、并且让足够多的人通过新教育体系接受教育、振兴经济，可能需要两到三代人（才能实现）。that it is是这种情况的意思？它是什么成分？

dismiss 这里是轻视的意思轻视了我们的能力,就解脱了我们的义务理解句子的话这个词不好单翻,结合起来是：与其说我们不过是习惯的奴隶罢了,不如主动培养新的习惯以便改善自己.creatures of habit 习惯的奴隶这样对不，差别好大翻译不就是这样么，拿到一个句子不大懂就先直译出来，再根据直译的意思稍加润饰。你给的翻译“不要说自己。。。”这个不就是轻视的意思么；“依据习惯行事的动物”（这里我要讲句实话，这句话翻的太直白了），我觉得还不如我的“习惯的奴隶”

你说的这个应该是2013年的英语一的第二篇阅读：Text 2　　An old saying has it that half of all advertising budgets are wasted-the trouble is, no one knows which half . In the internet age, at least in theory ,this fraction can be much reced . By watching what people search for, click on and say online, companies can aim “behavioural” ads at those most likely to buy.　　In the past couple of weeks a quarrel has illustrated the value to advertisers of such fine-grained information: Should advertisers assume that people are happy to be tracked and sent behavioural ads? Or should they have explicit permission?　　In December 2010 America's Federal Trade Cornmission (FTC) proposed adding a "do not track "(DNT) option to internet browsers ,so that users could tell adwertisers that they did not want to be followed .Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Apple's Safari both offer DNT ;Google's Chrome is e to do so this year. In February the FTC and Digltal Adwertising Alliance (DAA) agreed that the instry would get cracking on responging to DNT requests.　　On May 31st Microsoft Set off the row: It said that Internet Explorer 10,the version e to appear windows 8, would have DNT as a default.　　It is not yet clear how advertisers will respond. Geting a DNT signal does not oblige anyone to stop tracking, although some companies have promised to do so. Unable to tell whether someone really objects to behavioural ads or whether they are sticking with Microsoft’s default, some may ignore a DNT signal and press on anyway.　　Also unclear is why Microsoft has gone it alone. Atter all, it has an ad business too, which it says will comply with DNT requests, though it is still working out how. If it is trying to upset Google, which relies almost wholly on default will become the norm. DNT does not seem an obviously huge selling point for windows 8-though the firm has compared some of its other procts favourably with Google's on that count before. Brendon Lynch, Microsoft's chief privacy officer, bloggde:"we believe consumers should have more control." Could it really be that simple?

被激怒;必须在生活的间隙小尺寸孔的直接结果,望采纳。