2013年考研英语text3

2013年英语一阅读text4确实是非常难了。每年考试过后8月份或9月份公布成绩并颁发成绩单，根据教育部规定四六级考试不设置及格线，四级425分（含425分）以上可以报考六级，所以大家普遍认为四六级的合格线为425分。英语四六级的分数是排位分，没有总分。报名时间CET全国英语四六级考试的考试时间为：每年6月份、12月份（每年时间略有不同）。2019年1月15日，中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思听力得5分，即达到中国英语能力等级量表四级水平。

去百度文库，查看完整内容>内容来自用户:weiliang14222013年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一真题及答案Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making indivial decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that 1 the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by 2 factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big 3 was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samples of information they were working with. 4 , he theorised that a judge 5 of appearing too soft 6 crime might be more likely to send someone to prison 7 he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day.To 8 this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the 9 of an applicant should not depend on the few others 10 randomly for interview ring the same day, but Dr. Simonsohn suspected the truth was 11 .He studied the results of 9,323 MBA interviews 12 by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had 13 applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale 14

Text 4　　On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.　　An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.　　Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers　　However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.　　Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.　　The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.　　Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.　　36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they　　[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.　　[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.　　[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.　　[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.　　37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?　　[A] Federal officers’ ty to withhold immigrants’information.　　[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.　　[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.　　[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.　　38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts　　[A] violated the Constitution.　　[B] undermined the states’ interests.　　[C] supported the federal statute.　　[D] stood in favor of the states.　　39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement　　[A] outweighs that held by the states.　　[B] is dependent on the states’ support.　　[C] is established by federal statutes.　　[D] rarely goes against state laws.　　40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?　　[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.　　[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.　　[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.　　[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.

outsider status 指局外人身份 whereby 凭借的是 动作的发出者是第三方：情报事务所，上文有提雇员里有从事情报工作的人 第五段第二句 整句意思：那个公司的简报听起来不象华盛顿往来公文中的常见套话，情报事务所借此回避那些声明 以免出错。希望能帮到你。我们一起加油共勉本回答被提问者和网友采纳

这里应该是默认了洗手不用肥皂的意思，如you have many problems in communicating，like talking friendly with others.这里肯定是表明你与别人交流不礼貌。回到原文，它指的应该是用肥皂洗手这个问题（没有明确表明有没有用肥皂洗手），但从前后文推断可知他没用肥皂洗手。另一套中的instead of表达地比较明确纯属个人理解，仅供参考看了你的举例，有点顿悟了，谢谢！

progressing ... 和 suggesting ... 都是作状语分词短语，其逻辑主语是句子的主语 most。o is eternal instry the pr

对于这种实际情况我们实在值得庆幸，因为要在穷国建立全新的教育体系、并且让足够多的人通过新教育体系接受教育、振兴经济，可能需要两到三代人（才能实现）。that it is是这种情况的意思？它是什么成分？

句子的意思是 生产力提高上的限制正解释了为什么教育发展没有现在快 这里就是it is 就是现有的教育的状态 。如果是以前是 it used to 。这里应该是拿过去的教育就是生产力限制时期和当今比。

两句话都不妥，第一句话把anyone翻译成“有人”，第二句话应该把“是不是”去掉，应该这样说“许多人都感到困惑，（竟然）任何人都可以随意伤害动物”。