考研英语一2014t3

考研英语分为考研英语一和英语二，共享同一个考纲，词汇也是一样的，只是考查的难度与深度不同，英语一更难一些。

英语一编号为201，政治编号为101，而英语二编号为204。考研网上报名成功后，考生使用报名号登录网上报名网站，输入报名号，查看自己的报名信息就可以看到自己的初试考试科目。学术型研究生初试考英语一， 专业学位研究生初试考英语二。(一)学术型研究生学术型硕士研究生入学考试科目设置办法要求与2009年相同。除教育学、历史学、医学门类设置三个单元考试科目(政治理论、外国语、基础课，各科目试题满分分别为100分、100分、300分)外，其他各学科门类考试科目均设置四个单元(政治理论、外国语、基础课和专业基础课，各科目试题满分分别为100分、100分、150分、150分)。从2010年起增加一套统考英语试题(即英语二)供部分专业学位研究生招生时选用，原统考英语名称相应改为英语一。(二)专业学位研究生专业学位研究生入学考试科目第二单元(外国语)：法律硕士(非法学)、法律硕士(法学)、建筑学硕士、汉语国际教育硕士、临床医学硕士、口腔医学硕士、公共卫生硕士专业采用统考英语一(日语、俄语)；翻译硕士采用翻译硕士外语试题；其余各专业可选用统考英语一(日语、俄语)或英语二试题(英语二重点考查考生英语应用能力，尤其是阅读和翻译能力)。满分均为100分。

能做到，只要阅读在3个左右，别的就差不多哦；我当时备考的时候，我比较严格的看卷也能再65以上呢。后来各种原因，我没参加考试而已，可以互相交流哦我说的是北京地区，不是全国的考研卷不是分一卷二卷吗？一卷就是北京地区的看学校，如果是34所自主划线的学校（大部分985，清华北大之类的），英语一般要求60以上，如果考211类或者普通北京高校，英语就只需达到国家线即可。也就是说在50分左右就行。那60分以上的比例大概多少呢？追答看具体哪个学校，像对外经贸这样的学校的话虽然最后复试的时候是以国家线来的，但是最后我发现我们学校考上的绝大部分都是60分以上。

网上的答案可信度较低，有可能是网友上传的答案。应参考出版物上的答案。出版物的比较权威和严谨，毕竟是有管制的。建议看看华研外语那本《考研英语真题集训》，答案很权威。

考研英语考34分并不难，大部分考生的英语分数在35到50之间。考研英语平均分在50分左右，所以34分这个分数水平不高，没有达到英语的平均线。以2018到2020年英语平均成绩为例：1、2020年：英语一平均分49.15，英语二52.66。2、2019年：英语一平均分48.59，英语二55.21。3、2018年：英语一平均分48.61，英语二55.43。扩展资料考生觉得考研英语难度大的原因：1、考研学子的主观因素是导致英语考试难的重要因素在两年的大学英语学习之后，部分学生由于缺乏老师的指导监督，没有养成良好的英语学习习惯，放弃主动的英语学习。所以，在大三下学期准备考研时，大学生往往对英语感觉陌生，复习起来不得要领，就不用说那些工作多年的往届考生了，他们对于英语复习更是无从下手。加之考研英语选用的材料本身有相当的难度，考研学子感到英语难，这就成了顺理成章的事情了。2、考研英语是选拔性考试，选材难度远高于目前的大学英语教材考研英语大纲对英语考试的性质界定为高等学校和科研院所招收硕士研究生而设置的、具有选拔性质的全国统一入学考试科目。所以说，考研英语考试目的是科学、公平、有效地测试考生对英语语言的运用能力，评价的标准是高等学校非英语专业本科毕业生所能达到的及格或及格以上水平，以保证被录取者具有一定的英语水平，并有利于各高等学校和科研院所在专业上的择优选拔。3、具体到试卷题目来说，考研英语阅读难度大考研英语的重头戏是阅读，无论是第一部分的英语知识运用，还是第二部分的阅读理解A、B、C题型所选用的文章，多出自西方国家知名的报纸杂志。历年来出现频率较高的有英国的《经济学人》《卫报》，美国的《纽约时报》《华盛顿邮报》《纽约客》《时代周刊》等。上述报刊的受众大都是本国受过良好教育的精英或中产以上阶层，文章的撰写人多半是英美著名作家、评论人或资深记者编辑，具有深厚的文字功底和丰富的写作技巧。所以，考研英语文章无论是从词汇量、句子长度和难度，还是各种语法修辞等写作手段的应用来说，都比广大考生在两年的大学英语学习过程中接触的课文难上不止一个层次。通俗地讲，部分中国高校学生在两年大学英语学习，但是，在广泛实施大学英语分级教学的今天，很多高校学生的大学英语学习时长甚至缩短到了一年半，因为这个原因，大学生接触的所有课文加在一起，还不如一份《华盛顿邮报》的信息量大。而且，部分学生对大学英语课文的掌握程度难以令人满意。西方作者的写作逻辑和思维方式迥异于中文作者，这在客观上造就了英语考试难。一些考研英语文章的作者在表达观点时并非直抒胸臆，而是显得非常委婉，使得考生有时连文章大意都把握不住。考生越早意识到这些现实差距，越能够尽快树立正确的学习观和制定有效的复习策略。4、考研英语命题专家的思路难以把握考生觉得自己读懂了文章，但是一做题就出错。这是因为考研命题专家在设计阅读题干和选项时，总是会以各种方式设置思维陷阱，迷惑考生。说白了，考研英语命题专家天生就是来为难考生的，他们就是要想尽一切办法让考生难以准确找到答案。

我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助Text 1 In order to “change lives for the better” and rece “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously inlgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to inlge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU. 21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to [A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking. [C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily. [D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit. 22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means [A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre. [B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government. [C] to register for an allowance from the government. [D] to attend a governmental job-training program. 23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme? [A] A desire to secure a better life for all. [B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed. [C] An urge to be generous to the claimants. [D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers. 24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel [A] uneasy. [B] enraged. [C] insulted. [D] guilty. 25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree? [A] The British welfare system inlges jobseekers’ laziness. [B] Osborne’s reform will rece the risk of unemployment. [C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs. [D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.Text 2All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal ecation. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would rece costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow. 26. A lot of students take up law as their profession e to[A] the growing demand from clients[B] the increasing pressure of inflation[C] the prospect of working in big firms[D] the attraction of financial rewards27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal ecation in most American states?[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraate studies [B] Receiving training by professional associations[C] Admissions approval from the bar association[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because[A] prevents lawyers from gaining e profits.[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.30. In the text, the author mainly discusses[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.[C] the role undergraate studies in America’s legal ecation.[D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.

多看一些名著（必须原著是英文）的中英文版本，对照它们的翻译。还有就是听英语新闻，可以在网上听，听一句停一会儿自己翻译，到结束之后可以去看官方的翻译，找差距。写作的话，看语言比较规范的名著类的书，还有可以看看美国、英国的报纸什么的，很有帮助。最好有认识人的话，可以问往年都考些什么书目。写作、翻译主要靠平时的积累，如果功底扎实，怎么样考都还是很好。祝你考上！～～～加油加油加油！！！《2010年考研入门指导》《2010年考研初期三大选择》

从2014年2018年，五年的考研英语国家线的变动范围在4分之内（包含4分）。其中变化范围最大的是哲学、工学（不含工学照顾专业）和管理学专业。其次是变化范围为3分的法学、教育学（不含体育学）、文学、历史学、理学、医学（不含中医类照顾专业）、中医类照顾专业和工学照顾专业。变化范围为2分的有经济学、军事学和艺术学专业。范围为1分的专业没有。五年分数线没变的是农学、体育学和享受少数民族照顾政策的专业（考生）。从近三年来看，三年的考研英语国家线的变动范围在3分之内（含3分）。其中变化范围最大的是哲学和法学专业。变化范围为2分的专业有经济学、文学、历史学、工学（不含工学照顾专业）、军事学、管理学和艺术学专业。变化范围为1分的为教育学（不含体育学）、理学、医学（不含中医类照顾专业）和中医类照顾专业。三年分数线没变的有农学、体育学和享受少数民族照顾政策的专业（考生）。

不过关没复习，现在想二战