考研英语2006年阅读真题

我错了12个，我也觉得06年的格外难

您好，这个不了解不帮不了您，您可以到相关论坛或网络上查询相关信息

你好，我是大大大大鱼儿，用百度网盘分享给你，点开就可以保存，链接永久有效^_^链接:  提取码: 22vt

考研英语真题：阅读理解Text 1A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK "town of culture" award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zozl. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in E220m of investment and an avalache of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain' town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Livorpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for, the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow- village of culture ? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run "year of culture" washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community . The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community groups and cultural organizations. But it can be done : Glasgow' s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.A "town of culture" could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town'speculiarities-helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a "town of culture" award could________[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.[B] promote cooperation among Britain's towns.[C] increase the economic strength of Britain's towns.[D] focus Britain's limited resources on cultural events.22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as________[A] a sensible compromise.[B] a self-deceiving attempt.[C] an eye-catching bonus.[D] an inaccessible target.23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it________[A] endeavours to maintain its image.[B] meets the aspirations of its people.[C] brings its local arts to prominence.D] commits to its long-term growth.24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present________[A] a contrasting case.[B] a supporting example.[C] a background story,[D] a related topic.25. What is the author's attitude towards the proposal ?[A] Skeptical[B] Objective[C] Favourable[D] CriticalText 2Scientific publishing has long been a licence to print money. Scientists need joumals in which to publishtheir research, so they will supply the articles without monetary reward. Other scientists perform the specialised work of peer review also for free, because it is a central element in the acquisition of status and the proction of scientific knowledge.With the content of papers secured for free, the publisher needs only fnd a market for its journal. Until this century, university libraries were not very price sensitive. Scientific publishers routinely report profit margins approaching 40% on their operations, at a time when the rest of the publishing instry is in an existential crisis.The Dutch giant Elsevier, which claims to publish 25% of the scientific papers proced in the world,made profits of more than £900m last year, while UK universities alone spent more than £210m in 2016 toenable researchers to access their own publicly funded research; both figures seem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.The most drastic, and thoroughly illegal, reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub, a kind of global photocopier for scientific papers, set up in 2012, which now claims to offer access to every paywalled article published since 2015. The success of Sci-Hub, which relies on researchers passing on copies they have themselves legally accessed, shows the legal ecosystem has lost legitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies. In some ways it has been very successful. More than half of all British scientific research is now published under open access terms: either freely available from the moment of publication, or paywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed on general release.Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities. Publishers have responded to the demand that they make their proct free to readers by charging their writers fees to cover the costs of preparing an article. These range from around ￡500 to $5,000. A report last year pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these’’article preparation costs’’ had been steadily rising at a rate above inflation. In some ways the scientific publishing model resembles the economy of the social internet: labour is provided free in exchange for the hope of status, while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places. In both cases, we need a rebalancing of power.26. Scientific publishing is seen as“a licence to print money" partly because________[A] its funding has enjoyed a steady increase .[B] its marketing strategy has been successful.[C] its payment for peer review is reced.[D] its content acquisition costs nothing.27. According to Paragraphs 2 and 3, scientific publishers Elsevier have________[A] thrived mainly on university libraries.[B] gone through an existential crisis.[C] revived the publishing instry.[D] financed researchers generously.28. How does the author feel about the success of Sci-Hub?[A] Relieved.[B] Puzzled.[C] Concerned[D] Encouraged.29. It can be learned from Paragraphs 5 and 6 that open access terms________[A]allow publishers some room to make money.[B] render publishing much easier for scientists.[C] rece the cost of publication substantially.[D] free universities from financial burdens.30. Which of the following characterises the scientific publishing model?[A] Trial subscription is offered.[B] Labour triumphs over status.[C] Costs are well controlled.D] The few feed on the many.Text 3Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in Califomia, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the pereentage of women in the general population, but so what?The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.Wrting in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a"golden skirt "phenomenon, where the same clite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do litle to help average women.31. The author believes that the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad wills________[A] help little to rece gender bias.[B] pose a threat to the state government.[C] raise women's position in politics.[D] greatly broaden career options.32. Which of the following is true of the California measure?[A] It has irritated private business owners.[B] It is welcomed by the Supreme Court,[C] It may go against the Constitution.[D] It will settle the prior controversies.33. The author mentions the study by Catalyst to ilustrate____[A] the harm from arbitrary board decision.[B] the importance of constitutional guaranees.[C] the pressure on women in global corporations.[D] the needlessness of government interventions.34. Norway's adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to____[A] the underestimation of elite women's role.[B] the objection to female participation on boards.[C] the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.[D] the growing tension between labor and management.35. Which of the following can be inferred from the text?[A] Women's need in employment should be considered.[B] Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.[C] Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.[D] Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.Text 4Last Thursday, the French Senate passed a digital services tax, which would impose an entirely new taxon large multinationals that provide digital services to consumers or users in France. Digital services include everything from providing a platform for selling goods and services online to targeting advertising based on user data, and the tax applies to gross revenue from such servces. Many French politicians and media outlets have referred to this as a“GAFA tax," meaning that it is designed to apply primarily to companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon- in other words, multiational tech companies based in the United States.The digital services tax now awaits the signature of President Emmanuel Macron, who has expressed support for the measure, and it could go into effect within the next few weeks. But it has already sparked significant controversy, with the Unite Sates trade representative opening an investigation into whether the tax discriminates against American companies, which in turn could lead to trade sanctions against France.The French tax is not just a unilateral move by one country in need of revenue. Instead, the digital services tax is part of a much larger trend, with countries over the past few years proposing or putting in place an alphabet soup of new international tax provisions. These have included Britain's DPT (diverted profits tax), Australia's MAAL (multinational antiavoidance law), and India's SEP (significant economic presence) test, to name but a few. At the same time, the European Union, Spain, Britain and several other countries have all seriously contemplated digital services taxes.These unilateral developments differ in their specifics, but they are all designed to tax multinationals on income and revenue that countries believe they should have a right to tax, even if international tax rules do not grant them that right. In other words, they all share a view that the international tax system has failed to keep ;up with the current economy.In response to these many unilateral measures, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is currently working with 131 countries to reach a consensus by the end of 2020 on an international solution. Both France and the United States are involved in the organization' s work, but France's digital services tax and the American response raise questions about what the future holds for the international tax system.France‘s planned tax is a clear warning: Unless a broad consensus can be reached on reforming the international tax system, other nations are likely to follow suit, and American companies will face a cascade of different taxes from dozens of nations that will prove burdensome and costly.36. The French Senate has passed a bill to_____[A] regulate digital services platforms.[B] protect French companies' interests .[C] impose a levy on tech multinationals.[D] curb the influence of advertising.37. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that the digital services tax _____[A] may trigger countermeasures against France.[B] is apt to arouse criticism at home and abroad.[C] aims to ease international trade tensions.[D] will prompt the tech giants to quit France.38. The countries adopting the unilateral measures share the opinion that _____[A] redistribution of tech giants' revenue must be ensured.[B] the current international tax system needs upgrading.[C] tech multinationals' monopoly should be prevented.[D] all countries ought to enjoy equal taxing rights.39. It can be learned from Para 5 that the OECO's current work_____[A] is being resisted by US companies.[B] needs to be readjusted immediately.[C] is faced with uncertain prospects.[D] needs to in involve more countries.40. Which of the following might be the. best title for this text?[A] France Is Confronted with Trade Sanctions[B] France leads the charge on Digital Tax[C] France Says "NO" to Tech Multinationals[D] France Demands a Role in the Digital Economy考研英语真题：阅读理解的内容小编就说到这里了，关于考研备考技巧，报名入口，报名时间，考研成绩查询，报名费用，准考证打印入口及时间等问题，小编会及时更新。希望各位考生都能进入自己的理想考研院校。希望大家能好好复习。取得佳绩。

下面是我加的一些英语考研群，群文件里有英语资料，挺全的还。英语一和英语二的历年真题都有。希望可以帮到你！466731725,297860627,242353576,273818409,551082436,~~~~~~~~~

既然解析说作者乐观，那文章肯定就有跟乐观态度有关的词，一般都是在开头或结尾，楼主可以再找找看

10年真题做两遍（准确说是研究两遍！）后，再考虑阅读模拟题做（不能让自己停下来）以前网上说什么220篇好，结果我做石春祯的220，做了两篇就扔了（50块大洋糟蹋了阿！），做过真题就知道，石的文章很难，题目很简单，而真题是文章不算太难看懂，但题目超难，思路不能乱，一乱就完蛋！星火的考研阅读120篇听说还可以，但我没用过，我同学用过，说文章很难很偏，我看了一篇谈什么，蝙蝠侠，好莱坞最新电影，不看译文，根本不知道写什么东西！（扔不扔由你！）我当时用的是的什么多少篇，感觉还行，文章不是很难，感觉很好，练习吗，就是保持英文阅读状态，搞那么难干吗，而且的书都很有新意，看着很舒服！（其他书你也看看，但不要买120篇以上的，哪有时间？绝对浪费！）但星火不是一无是处，星火最后的模拟试卷，质量非常高，文章都标出选自最新国外杂志第几期，因为我做过各种模拟卷，星火的质量令我惊异，其用心程度令人感动（有感于做过太多垃圾试卷）！本人不才，今年考研英语70，以上确是肺腑之言，最后再送两句话，祝你成功！考期不至，单词不止，考期不临，阅读不停！|||考研英语阅读,真题最好了,做上三遍考试肯定没有问题了,做的过程中单词也背了,翻译也练了.|||我买考试虫的阅读资料，很好的，我觉得！我以前是英语专业的。至于星火的，没买，不知道怎么样|||不错，如果做有些难度的还是石春桢的，他的阅读文章难，问题相对不难。郭庆民的阅读和胡敏的阅读都接近真题水平。朱泰奇的英语适合整体复习使用，他的阅读感觉不怎么好，当然是一家之谈。在考研论坛上你可以看到很多人的评价，你也可以看到根自己英语水平差不多的人的选择，那对你很有帮助。|||我们这边都用石春桢200篇`如一楼所说，生词量和阅读难度大，但是问题简单。要得就是让你弄懂文章的意思。星火是三本装的，我用了。。觉得不大好|||你听我说，买高教的阅读专项训练，韩鹏著，你是不会后悔的，非常有水平，模拟得很接近真题的难度与出题格局，解答非常正确合理。

家里网速不给力明早去公司给你发2001—2010考研英语真题全文朗读MP3压缩后有310兆用 邮箱重新发了一遍给你注意查收记得先转存到中转站在文件中转站里下载还可以保存30天

探秘2014年考研英语（一）新题型真题 ——化解排序题做题技巧万学教育 海文考研 考研教学与研究中心 邢君兰一、课堂预测成现实，备选新题型的稳定性。从 2005 年研究生入学考试英语部分增加了新题型，这部分考查填空式阅读，即常说的七选五（完型填句段）、小标题、排序、观点例证。其中七选五（完型填句段）出现 6 次，分别年份是：2005、2006、2008、2009、2012、2013年，即每次都是连续考察完型填句段，其他题型穿插中间。而2007年考查了小标题，2010、2011年考查了排序题。在万学海文强化班中，就和各位学员分享了这个规律，因此当时预测2014年有可能考察排序题型，在讲解了解题技巧的同时并建议大家认真备考。这也充分说明了这个备选题型的成熟性。 二、课堂内容正中新题型话题2014年新题型排序题和万学 海文钻石卡II阶段讲义中练习题目来源于同一篇文章，所以今年的排序题无论从话题角度、文章特点上，各位钻石卡学员都占优势，另外今年排序题目试题稳定，做题过程中有一定线索可以遵循。 三、排序题解题有技巧。 今年的新题型是一篇涉及社会科学类的文章。主要讲的是考古学研究的说明文。文章结构清晰，基本没有出现了超纲词,更有利于考生根据上下文及选项的特征推断出正确选项。 万学海文强化班课程中就和各位学员分享过解题步骤：1、抓首段---预测主题与框架结构。迅速得知文章的主旨大意以及关键词 ; 以做到心中有数，至少应该能知道可以供考生选择的选项的意思范围，并且在很短的时间里找到考生想找到的选项； a.如首段给出，重点精读首段； b.如首段未给出，先依据篇章结构特点或特征词首先确定出首段。 2、大致定位---文章框架+段落特征3、精确定位---三种关联4、把自己选择的选项带入原文，检测是否文章前后连贯，检测所选的选项是否和文章的主旨大意相吻合 。并且提供了以下解题技巧： A.“ 打包处理原则 ” 有明显衔接词的段落可以放在一起，例如on the one hand, on the other hand； B.“ 时间原则 ” 现时间、年代等词语时，要注意文章中的时间和选项中的时间的对应关系； C.“ 代词原则 ” 示代词，因为是指代前面的内容，所以一般不能作为段落的开头； D.“ 重复原则 ” 果一个选项中的单词与文章中的单词重复比较多或意思相近的比较多，那么这个选项往往就是正确答案； E.“ 排除原则 ” ：做题时，胆大心细，建议大家最好使用排除原则，由易到难地去解题。 要提升大家段落大意的概括和提炼能力。一段文章，总体上讲的是什么？怎么样用简单、简洁的语言把这一段文章的总体意思概括起来，这是段落标题类。在一个段落里面，我们如何把握总体上讲了什么东西，这是我们考生平常阅读里欠缺的一个能力。建议大家多多练习提炼段落大意的能力，可以尝试每次看完一个段落就用简短汉语或者英文把段落主旨写在段落旁边。